Archive for the ‘Corporate Governance’ Category

Piercing the Corporate Veil

Saturday, March 20th, 2010

One of the most attractive features of a corporation is the ability of a shareholder to invest in the business without facing personal risk for the actions and debts of corporation. But this limited liability is not absolute. The doctrine of ignoring the corporate form and holding shareholders accountable is commonly known as “piercing the corporate veil”.

One method courts use to determine if corporate protections should be set aside is the alter ego test. Here, shareholders can be held personally liable when there is such a unity of interest between the corporation and the shareholders that they are essentially one in the same, and that some injustice would occur if the shareholders were permitted to escape personal liability.

When applying this test, courts will consider a number of factors, such as: whether corporate funds were used for personal use; whether personal and corporate property were held separately; whether stock was properly issued; whether the shareholders kept corporate records and adhered to legal formalities; and whether the corporation was adequately capitalized.

Courts have also used inadequate capitalization or undercapitalization as the sole means to pin liability on shareholders. Measuring the adequacy of capital is no easy task. Courts will look to whether capitalization is unreasonably small or illusory given the size, nature, and liabilities of the business. Although no bright-line rule has been set, officers and directors would do well to consult their financial advisors, prepare budgets and financial forecasts, and examine the need for liability insurance.

In short, to protect yourself from personal liability you must see to it that the corporation is ran on the up-and-up. Make sure that you and your fellow shareholders treat the corporation like a separate entity. See to it that the business has a reasonably strong capital structure. Observe all of your corporate formalities. Fulfill your tax obligations. Keep good records. And do not, under any circumstances, treat corporate property like personal property, or vice versa.

* LLC members should also take note. In California, much of the above also holds true for LLCs.

Management Structures for the LLC

Friday, March 12th, 2010

The California Limited Liability Company (LLC) is a business entity favored by many businesses because its corporate-like limited liability protections and its relatively informal structural and governance requirements. It also allows “members” (the LLC term for owner) to take advantage of the favorable tax treatment afforded to partnerships.

The California Corporations Code allows for two LLC management situations that should be considered prior to formation.

1. Management by all members: The Code’s default provisions provide that the LLC will be managed by all of its members unless its articles of organization state otherwise.

Before choosing an all-member management structure, the members should give careful consideration to how the day-to-day operations of the business will be carried out. Here, all members will generally have the authority to act on behalf of the LLC, binding it to any agreements he or she executes. Choosing this option does help avoid imposition of state and federal securities laws for each member, but it may complicate the businesses operations if some members choose to be less involved with the business.

2. Management by one or more managers: If your business opts for this type of management, no member, acting solely as a member, has the power to bind the LLC. This authority is reserved for the designated manger(s).

Managers can be elected or removed by the vote of a majority in interest of the members. These managers can be members, or they can be individuals without any ownership interest in the LLC who are selected (hopefully) for their experience and expertise. In either case, managers, if there is indeed more than one, have equal authority to manage the business. Unless the operating agreement provides otherwise, decisions will be made either by a majority vote of managers or by unanimous written consent.

LLC members may opt to go this route if one or more of them intends to be more of a passive investor in the venture. If so, it is important that those non-managing members consider the impact of securities laws which may require them to either register their LLC interest as a security, or seek an exemption to registration.

Nonprofit Governance Conference

Monday, March 8th, 2010

On April 21, 2010, the IRS, Georgetown Law School, and Independent Sector are co-sponsoring the 27th annual conference on Top Issues in Nonprofit Governance. This two-day event takes place at Georgetown University in Washington, DC.

According to the sponsors: “Now more than ever, nonprofit organizations need to take stock of their governance structure and operation, learn from the mistakes of others, and make changes to strengthen processes and practices. Government stakeholders, including state charity officials, Congress and the Internal Revenue Service, have made clear their expectations for better governance in the sector.”

Those involved with representing or managing a 501(c)(3) organization could find something to take away from this conference, including nonprofit CEOs, CFOs, and board members.

Go here for more information.